Variety网站给马银的Review让任饭大为不爽，攻击马银剧情幼稚和画面差，被PS3的R&C轰成了渣。Review认为虽然任天堂还有最好了开发人员，但是受到Wii的拖累，马里奥已经面临被其他同类型游戏取代的危险。

这篇文章右上角有索尼赞助的字样，让人怀疑是不是索尼出钱在抹黑马银。

http://nsidernews.com/sony-sponsored-mario-galaxy-review-is-the-worse-experience/


http://nsidernews.com/wp-content/uploads/sonysponsored_super_mario_galaxy_review.gif

:企鹅捶地: :企鹅捶地: :企鹅捶地: SONY强

大图片。
附件：: [您所在的用户组无法下载或查看附件]

:哇哦(赵叔专用): lz大号出现

马甲发了一个小图不过瘾，大号再来发个大图。

战神本体ID 横空出世？

真相在哪里……

SDF隶属？:可爱猴:

CNet是微软的,gamespot是Cnet的.
现在GS其实是被微软控制,一切评分都要看微软脸色,当然review怎么写不一定,但是评分一定需要微软审核.

sponsor只是赞助而已,review怎么写还是要看作者.

SONY强大！战神居然为任饭平反，看来果然N和M是同一整型的

http://www.variety.com/review/VE ... oryid=1269&cs=1

http://www.variety.com/review/VE ... =Super+Mario+Galaxy

这两个网址,一个有索尼赞助的字样一个没有,下面的review都是一样的

索尼其实只是赞助dvd videogame这个板块.home entertainment的板块同一篇review上面就没有sony赞助的字样

这证据很好很强大

SONY这么傻呀

说真的,抢银行的有不戴头罩并且把名字写在脸上的吗?

这种掩耳盗铃的事,我还真没见过.

某些人总是以为全世界人都和他一样傻.

战神已经迫不及待寻求NF的帮助了

LZ借N攻S,很好很强大

sony真的不聪明
在一次展会上，曾经用dog style攻击DS以及NF
也许他们认为这样很酷
什么美国贱民论等等，某种意义上，是差不多的
可能看到了网络时代，FRJJ之流搏出位的方法而受到了启发

SONY强大
就是有钱

对,继续编故事

。。。。。。233333

SONY 确实这样不够聪明啊。。。

拿瑞奇来喷
无语

抢劫银行后还留下自己的姓名与地址，美国马萨诸塞州一劫匪以奇怪方式“自投罗网”。

美联社21日报道，一个名叫梅伦德斯的男子上周在抢劫银行，他声称自己的背包内藏有炸弹，在得手后，将背包丢弃在银行现场后逃走。
随后赶到的警方派遣拆弹专家检查背包，遗憾的是他们并未找到炸弹，反而找到了写着梅伦德斯名字的通讯录，上面写着他的姓名、电话号码和家庭住址。
警方很快根据通讯录找到梅伦德斯的家，随后根据银行职员描述的劫匪容貌将梅伦德斯逮捕。
当地警长对此评论说：“显然这次他出了差错。”
不战，只是想起个笑话:企鹅筛沙:

只要不是瞎子或者傻子，是人都知道马淫和RC孰优孰劣...

:企鹅抽筋蹬腿: 233啊233

:企鹅弹吉他: 竟然还有SF在此帖出现

RC画面肯定好过SMG吧~~

只是国外的索奴向主子摇尾示好而已。

小白都能进,为什么SF不能进?

233........

被抓现行？

SONY你太油菜了！

捕风捉影，莫名其妙

那分明是sony赞助整个网站页面

此贴该锁，LZ该XHW

:企鹅喝茶:

平行世界真美丽。

马银本来也就一弱智游戏

Sony Sponsored Mario Galaxy Review: “The Worse Two-Player Experience”

Variety.com writer Ben Fritz puts his name on the Nintendo fan blackbook after writing an insanely bias Super Mario Galaxy review attacking not only Super Mario Galaxy, but also Nintendo’s Wii graphic performance and the use of the Wii-mote.


A desperate move by Sony to pay a writer to bad mouth what could possibly be “The Best Game of the Year” and most likely “The Best Game for the Nintendo Wii Console” and believe me I’m not a fanboy at all, in fact own a PS3.

As you read the review you will notice the majority of the effort is concentrated on picking apart the game’s limited two player mode, camara control, storyline and Nintendo’s Wii graphic shortcomings, this at a time when Super Mario Galaxy has received such a high amount of praise across the globe, even getting an unprecedented 11 out of 10 rating! This is simply neglecting to do justice where justice is deserved.

Ben Fritz not only burns himself writing a sponsored by Sony Super Mario Galaxy review, but he goes one step further by deleting several comments left on his review by angry readers who called his review biased, it’s amazing how this “reviewer” found Super Mario Galaxy “The Worse Experience” while at the same time declaring Ratchet and Clank for the PS3 “vastly superior” when it’s close to impossible not to find Super Mario Galaxy objectively groundbreaking and superior to current games in its category.

I just can’t seem to be able to take any of Ben’s points for a credible and honest opinion or criticism, or find in him any journalistic integrity.

I have screen saved a copy of the review, they might decide to take it offline, which I hope they do, check out the “Sponsored by Sony” logo on the right top section, I’m pretty sure that might disappear soon.

For Mr. Ben Fritz,
Sir, you are going at it alone, everyone else seems to love the game, and I bet you haven’t even played it for more than a couple of hours.

SONY是商户组……

战神还是算了 挑动N和S战 到底谁抹黑N呢 请看GS神站吧:企鹅抽筋蹬腿: :企鹅抽筋蹬腿: :企鹅抽筋蹬腿: