Unfortunately, our complaints don't stop there. The remainder of our criticisms are to blame for the discrepancy in scores between the PlayStation 3 version of the game and the 360 version (the PS3 version, after all, wasn't handled entirely by Valve). The PlayStation 3 Orange Box performs far worse, and this fact just isn't up for debate. While framerate issues aren't as problematic in Half-Life 2 and Episode One, Episode Two suffers a great deal, especially during the episode's larger battles. We regret to say that some sections border on being unplayable because of the stutters, which often cause your aim to be thrown off and timing shots to be very difficult. The problem isn't persistent throughout, but when it hits, it hits hard.

More troubling still is the difference in load times. Almost all the PS3 load times are at least five seconds more than the 360, but loading a saved game/loading after death is particularly awful. These clock in at about two to three times as long as the 360 version, which slows down the gameplay considerably. Even though the PS3 Orange Box sports a quicksave feature, any benefit of this option is lost considering the overall abundance of loading.

Even in Portal, a short title that often requires a little trial and error, this problem is massive. The 360 version takes about three seconds to load your last checkpoint if you die. The PS3 version takes seventeen. It hurts.

Less dire but perhaps more puzzling is the difference in color throughout the games. While this may just be a result of using our particular monitors, the PS3 version seems darker than its 360 counterpart. The difference is slight and, again, could be an isolated incident, but it's worth noting nonetheless.

______IGN

没翻译啊

把楼主打蒙 :D

居然！！！！！！
























没翻译

Unfortunately
关键词，loading慢，check point慢...

我看的懂没用啊，我是软饭:企鹅弹吉他:

本人这里不方便发表言论
用sony的话就是“这个问题不好说”

大概上意译：

The PlayStation 3 Orange Box performs far worse
ps3 橙盒表现得很糟糕。

The problem isn't persistent throughout, but when it hits, it hits hard.
问题不是始终存在，但是当它出现，就会把你打得满地找牙。

the difference in load times. Almost all the PS3 load times are at least five seconds more than the 360,
区别在于读盘时间，大多数的ps3游戏读盘时间比360要多至少5秒。

The 360 version takes about three seconds to load your last checkpoint if you die. The PS3 version takes seventeen.
如果你挂了，360版需要大约3秒读盘从最近的checkpoint继续游戏，ps3需要17秒。


这大嘴巴抽的，233马克斯

别了，司徒雷登 :D

xhw a

看的出从微软过去的兄弟起了巨大的作用啊.....

:企鹅捶地: :企鹅捶地: :企鹅捶地: :企鹅捶地:

VALVE的胖大叔怨念真厉害，EA太UBI了。:真忘踩企鹅:

:企鹅中暑: Oh my God

老摩尔果然不是去EA吃干饭的阿~:哇哦(赵叔专用):

ps2时代用的那招不灵了。。。。微软不是sega啊..............

360这D9 5块片那个时候读取能力比BD快了。。。呵呵:D

论速度
12x DVD > 2x BD
12 x 1.35 > 2 x 4.5

直接看影片吧...看完就清楚了:D
http://download.gamevideos.com/1 ... omparo_1280x720.wmv

这个问题N年前已经战到滥掉了，老帖复活吧。。。呵呵:D

http://tgfc.qwd1.com/club/thread-5798467-7-1.html

the difference in load times. Almost all the PS3 load times are at least five seconds more than the 360,
区别在于读盘时间，大多数的ps3游戏读盘时间比360要多至少5秒。


好强的翻译，不得不服

难为value了，还要再为HL2重新写套opengl的引擎，估计随意将就过去了，能骗多少是多少:囧RZ:

扔给EA，就搞出这么个东西？

对于硬盘标配的PS3来说，不知道安装以后的LOAD时间怎么样

神鸡洗洗睡吧 ～～～～

我说的那只是理论持续传输峰值。

游戏嘛，还是读零碎的数据，这寻道之类的乱七八糟的算起来，BD的速度就很难说了。

BD的数据密度高，这谁都知道，目前的技术肯定是寻道慢。

米卢说得好，态度决定一切

扔给EA，才会搞出这么个东西

这游戏认真做也划不来吧

果然蓝光读盘比较慢

一句话，就是读盘偏慢呗

神姬饭会高速你：橙盒就是垃圾，咱们要看得分9.6的UT3！

另外，怎么不安装到神姬饭引以为傲的虚拟内存？
可见EA实在是太Ubi了！

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/acti ... ary&tag=summary;review

The Bad
The frame rate struggles at times and the loading times are a bit long.

BTW. PC/XO版得分: 9.5 vs 神姬版 9.0

看了GV的对比动画
神机的FSAA这回比XO高
不过神机loading实在是忍无可忍
话说都HL2了, 其实也没什么好争的
分明就是态度问题
499的显卡随便720p 4AA全速跑

这游戏打着打着就定住读地图
读盘慢还不把人闷死……
EA太坏了，肯定是故意的:企鹅满地打滚: :企鹅满地打滚: :企鹅满地打滚: :企鹅满地打滚: